The Civilian

All the news that’s fit on a page. Now in the present day!

Search

Opinion: I don’t know how to be any more clear. No, really, I don’t. Please help

Christopher Luxon, smiling, in a navy suit, pink shirt and patterned tie, in front of a blurred glass-and-blind background.

By Christopher Luxon.

“I don’t know how to be any clearer with you, mate.”

That’s what I said to a Press reporter yesterday when he asked me whether I would still be open to working with the O party, Opportunity.

He was immediately rude to me, saying that I could be clearer, that I could use words like “No” and “Yes” and “100%” and “Right on.”

But I wasn’t saying it wasn’t possible. It was a cry for help. I really don’t know. I need someone to help me. This is a nightmare.

I don’t really know where it all began, but I used to be able to be clear. I’d say, “I’ll have the marmite,” or “I like the Fruju Tropical Snow.” I used to pass people going the other way on the footpath and settle on a side in no less than 4 attempts.

At Air New Zealand, I still had it. I strategically aligned us to laser focus on a range of deal-closing strategies, and successfully transitioned thousands of people to unemployment. When I’d leave the room after a board meeting, I’d hear people whisper to each other “clear.” I thought “great.”

But then John Key told me to do politics. He called up National and said I was leader now. Suddenly people were asking me questions, pointed questions, like do I have any numbers? (I didn’t know there were numbers, I was just leader now, John said so), or how many houses do you own? (I should be clear to you here that it is a series of houses).

Mike Hosking got stuck into me when he asked me whether I’d have fired Andrew Bayly if he hadn’t resigned.

“That’s a hypothetical,” I said.

“But would you or wouldn’t you have?”

“Well it’s a hypothetical, Mike”, I reiterated, clearly. Or so I thought. But Mike said I wasn’t clear. He said it a lot.

I wasn’t sure why. I’d given the right answer; it was a hypothetical, a hypothetical that relied entirely on the premise I knew who that was.

It started to creep its way into my marriage. Amanda asked me when I’m home from Wellington what I’d like for dinner. That presented a series of clear challenges. She didn’t seem happy with that answer but I don’t know what else you’d say about it.

I also couldn’t understand what was wrong with the shopping list – I very clearly outlined a range of foodstuff categories that would get our family back on track. Apparently it was bad enough the shopping bill got down to $60.

When I met Barack Obama, he said “let me be clear”, a lot, and then he’d say something that wasn’t clear at all. It was very confusing. Maybe I didn’t know what clear was anymore.

It’s not that I’m not trying. I just need a good decision-making training pathway, or a behavioural competency framework, or four hours of professional development and networking at The Viaduct.

Every night, when I make the transition to sleep, I think, “how can I have expressed our clear position on this even more clearly so I can keep talking about how consistent I’ve been?”

Which is why, in July, I announced very clearly that there would be an election, and that after that election, I was ruling out working with the O party.

When I was asked why, the media misheard me to say “land tax”, but I’d actually said I was against their policy to “kill cats”. Apparently they got rid of that policy. Now I find out they’re not all that fussed about the land tax either.

But it didn’t matter, because finally I felt I’d been clear. People called me stupid, and a dickhead, said I was foolish, and that I’d “lose the election.” All sorts of things, and none of them that I hadn’t been clear.

Until now. I don’t know what happened. All I did was say clearly that I’d work with whoever we need to to remain in power. But I am ruling out O. And Labour. And the Maori party. And the Greens. And Boko Haram, on a case-by-case basis.

I’m not saying we won’t go into coalition with them, just that we’re ruling them out.

That’s been very consistently our position. In fact, maybe I am clear. Maybe I just need to explain more how clear it is.

The Civilian asked party leaders a yes or no survey question about whether they’d be open to working with Opportunity. Hipkins, Swarbrick, Waititi, Peters, Seymour and Wong replied yes. Luxon sent us this whole fucking thing.

Share this article